Endangered speeches how much

The band, which performs at the Middle East Downstairs on Wednesday night, has gone through several incarnations since , when Konstantara arrived in Boston from her native Athens, a year-old music student looking for a crew to play the reggae songs she had been writing since adolescence. After several attempts at forming a band led nowhere, Konstantara established Endangered Speeches as it now exists to be the strong, cohesive group she needs to execute her vision.

Number two is consistency, because even though we are doing this for almost no money, this is something people put a lot of energy and time into. And number three is musicianship. People in the band have spent a good amount of time working on their instrument and also their mind and their spirit, which hides behind their instrument.

Ranging in age from 18 to 29, the members represent five nationalities and various musical specialties, with influences such as Bob Marley, RZA, and Lauryn Hill. Some people are actively joining in the discussion, while others excuse themselves to head to class or quietly tinker with instruments in the background. And that comes with really being on the same page with someone on important subjects, like mind and soul.

In other words, she is highly critical of the attempt to transform public spaces, such as university campuses and social media platforms, into safe spaces.

Here are a few takeaways from the event:. She also argued that children and college-age students are thought to be vulnerable, easily affected by words, and in need of emotional protection. Both Williams and Rainsborough argued that when you try to say something controversial on a university campus, you receive backlash because the university is inundated with homogenous liberal thought. In an effort to protect their students and serve them as a customer to whom they provide a service, universities have adapted into one-laned thought havens rather than centres of intellectual risk-taking.

Williams provided a series of claims for why she believes universities in the 21st century are left-leaning. First, she argued that university staff recruit in their own image and praise work they agree with.

Second, she emphasised the increasing perception of students as more vulnerable and emotionally fragile than the rest of the population. Rainsborough argued that this comes from questionable parenting techniques. Next, Williams postulated the student as a consumer whom the university, which is then providing a service, must satisfy.

For this reason, universities stop serving as a beacon of intellectual risk-taking. Williams argued that the idea that language constructs identity implies a very vulnerable sense of identity if it can be so readily dismissed through language. Williams posited that we no longer focus on which policy works better. Instead, we deem one policy moral and the other amoral.

Any debate and challenge, then, is perceived as more dangerous. The audience was active in posing questions for Williams; the question and answer session lasted just as long as the talk, clocking in at an hour each.