Before Newton, John Wallis suggested the use of negative exponents but did not actually use them Cajori vol. Fractions as exponents. The first use of fractional exponents although not with the modern notation is by Nicole Oresme c.
According to Cajori , this notation remained unnoticed. John Wallis , in his Arithmetica infinitorum which was published in , speaks of fractional "indices" but does not actually write them Cajori vol. Fractional exponents in the modern notation were first used by Isaac Newton in the letter referred to above Cajori , page Scientific notation.
The earliest use of scientific notation is not known. However, some physicists working with electricity in in the decade or so up to , when our modern volt, ohm, etc. James A. Landau has found only two usages of scientific notation in Maxwell's collected papers, and could find no other physicists of mid-century using scientific notation.
An even earlier possible use of scientific notation is by Robert Whillhelm Bunsen in in Philosophical Transactions, where these formulae appear on page In in Mental Arithmetic, M.
In in Text-Book of Algebra by G. Fisher and I. In in High School Algebra, Elementary Course by Slaught and Lennes, it is recommended that multiplications in any order be performed first, then divisions as they occur from left to right. Hart has: "Indicated operations are to be performed in the following order: first, all multiplications and divisions in their order from left to right; then all additions and subtractions from left to right.
Hart has: " Order of operations. In a sequence of the fundamental operations on numbers, it is agreed that operations under radical signs or within symbols of grouping shall be performed before all others; that, otherwise, all multiplications and divisions shall be performed first, proceeding from left to right, and afterwards all additions and subtractions, proceeding again from left to right. Modern textbooks seem to agree that all multiplications and divisions should be performed in order from left to right.
A representative for the publisher has acknowledged that the expression is ambiguous and promises to use st in the next revision. X for vector product was used in in J. Gibbs's Vector Analysis by E. Postfix notation or RPN began as prefix notation, a mathematical notation which did away with grouping symbols. It was proposed by Jan Lukasiewicz Then it was discovered that it is much more convenient to place the operands first and operators last, so "Postfix" or "reverse Lukasiewicz" or "reverse Polish" notation was created.
With postfix notation the operators themselves become delimiters between operations. The product symbol was introduced by Rene Descartes, according to Gullberg. Square root. The first use of was in by Leonardo of Pisa in Practica geometriae, where the symbol meant "square root" Cajori vol. The radical symbol first appeared in in Die Coss by Christoff Rudolff He used without the vinculum for square roots.
He did not use indices to indicate higher roots, but instead modified the appearance of the radical symbol for higher roots. It is often suggested that the origin of the modern radical symbol is that it is an altered letter r, the first letter in the word radix.
This is the opinion of Leonhard Euler in his Institutiones calculi differentialis Placement of the index within the opening of the radical sign was suggested in by Albert Girard in Invention nouvelle.
He suggested this notation for the cube root DSB; Cajori vol. According to Tropfke, Geschichte der Elementarmathematik, 4th edition, vol. VII,3 N.
In the Mathematical Gazette of Feb. Heppel wrote, "Following Chrystal, Todhunter, Hall and Knight, and the majority of writers [sqrt] a should be considered a quantity having one and not two values, although the algebra of C. Smith and the article by Professor Kelland in the Encyclopedia Britannica make [sqrt] a have two values. Foundations of Differential Calculus Springer. The relevant sentence is on page 17 of Blanton.
His translation is:. This symbol was used by Lagrange, but otherwise received little attention during the eighteenth century Cajori vol. Frederick Rickey. Absolute value of a difference. The tilde was introduced for this purpose by William Oughtred in the Clavis Mathematicae Key to Mathematics , composed about and published in London in , according to Smith, who shows a reversed tilde Smith , page In , Arthur Cayley used the modern notation for the determinant of a matrix, a single vertical line on both sides of the entries.
The notation appeared in the Cambridge Mathematical Journal, Vol. II , p. However, Cayley used commas to separate entries within rows Cajori vol.
The double vertical line notation was introduced by Cayley in Cajori vol. Cajori vol. Over the next few years, he also earned a degree in medicine and wrote the exquisitely titled monograph The Urinal of Physick , detailing what a physician could learn from a patient's urine. Either medicine proved less fascinating than Recorde had anticipated, or less lucrative. Over the next decade, he moved from medicine to finance and oversaw mints in Bristol, London, and Dublin.
The writer's life, however, clearly appealed to him. He produced a large and varied body of work: theological tracts defending Protestantism, poems, and most importantly, textbooks. Not only did Recorde explain astronomy, geometry, and arithmetic in successive textbooks, but he explained them in English.
Previous works on mathematics were written in Latin, meaning the only people who could read them already had an extensive education. Recorde wrote in English for the British layman. For these busy learners, he came up with his most famous invention. His final book, The Whetstone of Witte , published in , gave the world the equals sign. Perhaps a man trained to study urine and keep control over currency has a pragmatic mind.
Recorde found it irritating to have to state over and over that one side of an equation was equal to the other side.
He wrote, with obvious annoyance and whimsical spelling, "And to avoide the tedious repetition of these woordes, is equalle to, I will sette as I doe often in woorke use, a paire of paralleles.
What symbol could be more appropriate than a pair of equal-length lines? Nothing, Recorde explained, "noe 2 thyngs, can be moare equalle. Recorde's symbol didn't catch on at first.
The language of Latin still held sway during the 16th century. Latin had a word for the concept, "aequalis," and if more concision was necessary, people could shorten it to "ae" or "oe. In combination, these signs allowed people to express, quickly and with a minimum of wasted ink, a mathematical equation in symbols. At first glance, this makes Robert Recorde an excellent trivia game topic, but not much more.
John V. Tucker, a professor of computer science at Swansea University and an avid researcher of computability theory, argues that Recorde is far more significant than his reputation suggests. Computing is largely about collecting, creating, and processing data. It is universal and ubiquitous because it is intimate with the world's work
0コメント